Go Cloud Hosting; Public vs private cloud comparison

Go Cloud Hosting; Public vs private cloud comparison Go Cloud Hosting; Public vs private cloud comparison from a customer point of view.

Many customers may want to go along with a hybrid methodology – a blend of public and private clouds. Given below are the points to consider before coming to a decision in this regard.

  1. Kind of business – If you’re a web-based company, then public cloud really is a no brainer. Regulated industries like, for instance, insurance and financial services will have a harder time to go only with public clouds. So, you may begin making use of a VMware-based private cloud services and then, when you make a decision to make use of or present Services/APIs to customers/associates or your compute cycles for a point project are exponentially higher, you may look for adding the public cloud as part of your strategy.
  2. Cloud provider type – self services such as Google or high touch (Rackspace, Sunguard, and so on…). This aspect is mostly about how you would like to access the services. High touch has got its advantages, but it’s also pricey. Over an extended time period the traces would blur, but for the next 10 years or so, at least, the difference in the approach is going to be stark.
  3. Use circumstances – what you are doing will define the way you carry it out. If the information is very vulnerable and cannot leave the system firewall, then you may possibly take a decision to start up with the private cloud. Protection of the data will be a really significant criterion in deciding whether you want to use the public or the private cloud.
  4. Control – this extends back to the above discussed point. Businesses will want visibility and control. Granular control on things like authentication, permission, information masking, etc… Similar to much of the web/cloud solution, it has to be simple, easy and has got to scale.

Regardless of whether it is a public or a private cloud, what are some of the key aspects that users really understand with respect to cloud computing?

The answer really depends on the provider and type of service the user is trying to find. In practically all the cases, there’s very little or no client support within the domain of a public cloud. In addition, there are the protection concerns, in relation to both remote exploits and group-policy administration options (or lack of it thereof).

Most public cloud offerings aren’t configured for steady-state applications. Actually, high base-load application packages could actually be a lot more expensive to operate in the public cloud. This is mainly because the public cloud service providers statistically multiplex (in other words, most likely oversubscribe) their load capacities. Consequently, businesses making use of very highly transactional databases or high-performance software applications use bare-metal or private cloud hosting, or a hybrid model of public front-end and private or bare-metal back-end architectures.

Certain application packages simply function better on bare-metal infrastructure, but it doesn’t suggest that every tier of a system’s architecture really needs to operate on bare- metal to be most efficient. Customers can easily operate their web services in the public cloud and load-balance their traffic across a number of virtual servers, but retain the transactional aspects of their system functioning on their own devoted machines.

A brief explanation on the Hybrid Cloud Hosting model.

A hybrid cloud might relate to a combination of the public and private clouds (combined cloud), or the utilization of physical equipment together with a virtualized cloud server for a common service/application. It also relate to a sort of web hosting service in which both cloud hosting and managed dedicated servers get leveraged upon. A hybrid storage cloud normally utilizes a combination of private and public storage clouds, very common

Tags: , , , , ,

Speak Your Mind

Connect with Facebook

*